Health
Notice: Undefined variable: id in /home/httpd-files/bworldonline/bworldonline.com/assets/storytools.php on line 9
Notice: Undefined variable: id in /home/httpd-files/bworldonline/bworldonline.com/assets/storytools.php on line 15
Story tools
Vol. XXI, No. 21
Friday-Saturday, August 24-25, 2007 | MANILA, PHILIPPINES
Health
Scientists finger Marburg virus culprit: fruit bats
Paris — Scientists reported Wednesday that they had finally
fingered the culprit in the spread of Marburg virus, a singularly lethal disease
that has baffled virologists for nearly four decades: the African fruit bat.
The researchers from Gabon and the United States examined over 1,100 bats
from ten species, but detected the virus’ RNA genome and antibodies only in
Rousettus aegyptiacus, a common fruit bat found all across sub-Saharan Africa.
Marburg and its deadly cousin Ebola virus have caused large outbreaks with
extremely high fatality rates — 80 to 90 percent — in humans and great apes.
No vaccine or drug therapy has proven effective in warding off or curing
the disease, which causes horrendous symptoms including internal bleeding, high
fevers, coma and renal failure.
Death from shock usually occurs a week after clinical onset of symptoms.
Biggest outbreak
The world’s biggest outbreak of Marburg occurred in Angola from October
2004 to July 2005, infecting 374 people, 329 of whom died, according to an
official toll.
The study reports finding viral RNA in four of 283 R. aegyptiacus bats
collected in Gabon and the Republic of Congo in 2005 and 2006. Another 29 bats
of the same species tested serologically positive for Marburg, showing traces of
antibodies providing immunity against the virus.
Neither Marburg-virus RNA nor specific antibodies were detected in any of
the other species of bats tested, according to the study, published in the
online science journal PLoS ONE.
"Identifying Marburg infection in the African fruit bats brings us one
step closer to understanding this deadly disease," said one of the study’s
authors, Eric Leroy of the Centre International de Recherches Medicales de
Franceville in Gabon.
Scientists had been trying to pinpoint the "natural reservoir" of the
virus ever since the initial outbreak among laboratory workers in Germany 40
years ago.
Fruit bats fingered
Bats became likely culprits after the recent discovery of the related
Ebola virus in fruit bats in Gabon and the Republic of Congo, and an outbreak of
Marburg hemorrhagic fever in a gold mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo
containing a large number of the nocturnal flying mammals.
The fruit bats that tested positive for the disease are the first
naturally-infected non-primates ever identified, the paper said.
It is also the first report of Marburg in this area of Africa, suggesting
that the risk of further outbreaks may be higher than previously thought.
"From a public health perspective, this discovery offers us new insight
into the transmission of Marburg virus and potentially other filoviruses," said
lead author Jonathan Towner, a senior microbiologist at the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention in Atlanta, referring to the family of viruses that
includes Ebola.
Marburg infections were recently reported among miners in Uganda, where
another team of researchers captured bats for testing, the World Health
Organization said last week.
|